AI for SEC filings

Yes, for the mechanical layer of the review. Finiti checks that each number agrees everywhere it appears, that cross-references point to the right place, that narrative statements are supported by source documents, and that each required disclosure item is addressed.

Finiti keeps its rules current: Regulation S-K, the SEC's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) and other regulatory guidance are refreshed and mapped to each disclosure item. It then applies those rules to the facts of your company, drawn from your prior filings and your own documents, rather than to a generic issuer.

Every finding cites the page and section it relies on. Judgment calls, such as materiality and how to word a sensitive disclosure, stay with your team.

Yes. Tick-and-tie is the check that every figure and statement in a filing matches its support. Finiti reconciles each number across the document, ties narrative statements to their supporting source in your document vault, lists any support that is still outstanding, and logs what was checked, against which version, and when.

Your team reviews the inconsistencies Finiti flags instead of re-checking every figure by hand.

Finiti reads the draft against the rules that apply to the form: Regulation S-K items, SEC staff guidance and Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs), and patterns in SEC comment letters. It flags missing or thin disclosure and cites the rule, page and section behind each flag.

For Hong Kong issuers, the same check runs against the HKEX Listing Rules. It is the line-by-line review your team runs by hand today, done in minutes. Background: What is Regulation S-K.

Finiti checks drafts against SEC comment-letter patterns as part of its form check, so issues surface while they are still private and fixable. MD&A and non-GAAP measures were the two most frequent SEC comment areas in the 12 months to June 30, 2025, followed by segment reporting and revenue recognition (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance).

Background: What is an SEC comment letter?

Every Finiti finding cites the page and section of its source (the filing, the rule or the document in your vault), and every check leaves a versioned record of what was reviewed, against what, and when. You verify the trail, not the claim.

ABA Formal Opinion 512 warns that uncritical reliance on AI output without independent verification can lead to inaccurate advice. The trail is what makes that verification practical.

General-purpose AI generates plausible language from public text and asks you to trust the answer. Finiti works from your own documents and the applicable rulebook, cites every conclusion to its source, and keeps a versioned record of what was checked.

It runs specific checks on a filing (reconciliation, form check, benchmarking) rather than answering open-ended prompts. See the full comparison.

Finiti integrates with Workiva and Intelligize. Workiva holds your filing data and Intelligize holds your research; Finiti is the workflow layer on top of them, where the work gets done.

For example: take a draft 10-K from Workiva, tie every figure to its source, run the Regulation S-K form check and send back a redline. Take the precedent you found in Intelligize and draft your own disclosure from it, cited to your documents. Benchmark your risk factors against the peers you were researching and get a list of gaps, not a reading list. See the full comparison.

The same people as before. The officers who sign and certify the filing (for example, under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302) and the counsel who advise on it remain responsible for its content. Using a review tool does not shift that responsibility.

Finiti is built for that reality: it gives the people who sign a documented record of what was checked and who approved the final language.